Very interesting and will try the Diatomaceous Earth. I found what looks like a much better source of it and looks like they have been in business longer. They have so much information! Earthworkshealth.com
Very interesting. From the perspective of the theory of cure, many things come to mind. First, of course,
What happens after a case of eye floaters is cured? .... and the answer...
Nothing. Eye floaters cured is not medically defined. There are medical observation tests for eye floaters, but no test for "eye floaters cured." It is not possible to prove a case of "eye floaters" has been cured, much less to prove the "cause of the cure."
We can consider a more in depth look, and ask:
What happens after a case of eye floaters is "partially cured?" Partially cured is not medically defined for any disease. It is not possible to prove a case of any disease is partially cured.
What happens after a case of eye floaters is "temporarily cured?" Temporarily cured is not medically defined. It is not possible to prove a case of eye floaters temporarily cured.
Although eye floaters is recognized medically as a "disease" and can be diagnosed, there appears to be little medical interest unless the treatment is a profitable patent medicine or surgery or laser surgery. Even the concept of cause and cure is not taken seriously.
For example, the Mayo Clinic advises: "Your eye care specialist conducts a complete eye exam to determine the cause of your eye floaters." - surely then if the cause is easily determined, the cure is not difficult? But no. The Mayo Clinic suggests surgical treatments - but the word cure is carefully avoided. After all, people who claim to cure, even to cure a trivial case of any illness, are quacks, not doctors. It's official.
If you cure your eye floaters - nobody cares. If your grandmother, grandchild, or alternative practitioner or health food store staff member cures your eye floaters - nobody cares.
However, if you dare try to sell a product that contains a "claim" to cure eye floaters, even a claim to "treat" eye floaters, even a claim to "prevent" eye floaters, the pharma bureaucrats will shut you down and if necessary confiscate your profit to "protect the public." It makes you difference if the same product, like MSM, is sold "without the claim." Selling a product with a "health claim" is a medical offence. If you offer to cure patients with eye floaters or (horror) actually succeed - even a case so trivial in the eyes of the Mayo Clinic that "Most eye floaters don't require treatment." You will be practicing medicine without a license - because licensed physicians know the "Standard of Care" for most cases of eye floaters is no treatment.
Success? It's not considered important. Cures and cured claims can be safely ignored, unless you are making a profit.
That was all very well said. If only we could get you into medical schools. “there appears to be little medical interest unless the treatment is a profitable patent medicine or surgery or laser surgery. Even the concept of cause and cure is not taken seriously.” Absolutely.
Oh it was like a sci-fi horror movie. I didn't know yet. Going out for morning walks, electrical shocks thru brain and across skull, freaking out, thought it was a stroke, but nothing would happen. Sixty days like that. Pressure behind R eye was so bad, I swear it felt like it'd pop out, blood and brain gushing behind it. I'm lucky to still have that eye and no retinal detachment (fingers crossed). FQs have also caused people to go blind.
What so insidious about floaters is that they are a daily reminder of the FQ torture. Not butting into your business, but imo, your floaters are the floxing. NEVER had one in my life till then.
I've tried MSM drops, they seem to have helped, but then the floater's back. What I've noticed, strange as it may sound, is this:
Floxing functions in waves. The toxic reactions wax and wane. The waxing are the "flares." Every floxed victim knows exactly what the flares are like. I've had periods of apparent total "normalcy." Then a few days, or a week later, whamo! The tsunami hits. So... during a period where I was doing quite well, thinking that the toxic reactions were over, I no longer noticed the floater. It appeared to be gone. Now that I've been going thru a mild-relapse/flare, the floater's back. Is that possible? I don't know. But that's been my subjective observation.
I got lots of herxheimer reactions - whenever my body starts to heal, like after I try a fast, do a detox, do softwave, old symptoms and pains come back and then go away but then things are better. Has happened hundreds of times to me. I just expect it now. Not sure if that is the same thing as a “flare” - I also have to be very mindful of how much fluoride I get - when levels get high enough, all the same symptoms come back and there is nothing healing about that - it’s just too much fluoride for my system since I am now sensitive to fluoride. I have wondered if that’s what “flares” are for others but Idk.
lost a big reply. anyway. 1) I disagree with gahlili that floxing is just a flouride phenonm . 2) the atom is actually fluorine, good to specify, and 3) herxheimer (say what?), - Flares are merely a remanifestation, resurgence, of the original symptomns of the floxing (often with new ones appearing).
"whenever my body starts to heal, like after I try a fast, do a detox, do softwave, old symptoms and pains come back and then go away but then things are better"
How do you know that you would not be in the same state of recovery on your own, without any external support, based just on your genes. Because in fqad world there's much talk about that: that it's basically your body's ability to recovery and TIME.
Have you been able to determine that something EXTERNAL actually made a difference?
Because I haven't.
I'm not saying they don't. I just have not been able to PROVE it. Or at least DETERMINE it.
Very interesting and will try the Diatomaceous Earth. I found what looks like a much better source of it and looks like they have been in business longer. They have so much information! Earthworkshealth.com
Very interesting. From the perspective of the theory of cure, many things come to mind. First, of course,
What happens after a case of eye floaters is cured? .... and the answer...
Nothing. Eye floaters cured is not medically defined. There are medical observation tests for eye floaters, but no test for "eye floaters cured." It is not possible to prove a case of "eye floaters" has been cured, much less to prove the "cause of the cure."
We can consider a more in depth look, and ask:
What happens after a case of eye floaters is "partially cured?" Partially cured is not medically defined for any disease. It is not possible to prove a case of any disease is partially cured.
What happens after a case of eye floaters is "temporarily cured?" Temporarily cured is not medically defined. It is not possible to prove a case of eye floaters temporarily cured.
Although eye floaters is recognized medically as a "disease" and can be diagnosed, there appears to be little medical interest unless the treatment is a profitable patent medicine or surgery or laser surgery. Even the concept of cause and cure is not taken seriously.
For example, the Mayo Clinic advises: "Your eye care specialist conducts a complete eye exam to determine the cause of your eye floaters." - surely then if the cause is easily determined, the cure is not difficult? But no. The Mayo Clinic suggests surgical treatments - but the word cure is carefully avoided. After all, people who claim to cure, even to cure a trivial case of any illness, are quacks, not doctors. It's official.
If you cure your eye floaters - nobody cares. If your grandmother, grandchild, or alternative practitioner or health food store staff member cures your eye floaters - nobody cares.
However, if you dare try to sell a product that contains a "claim" to cure eye floaters, even a claim to "treat" eye floaters, even a claim to "prevent" eye floaters, the pharma bureaucrats will shut you down and if necessary confiscate your profit to "protect the public." It makes you difference if the same product, like MSM, is sold "without the claim." Selling a product with a "health claim" is a medical offence. If you offer to cure patients with eye floaters or (horror) actually succeed - even a case so trivial in the eyes of the Mayo Clinic that "Most eye floaters don't require treatment." You will be practicing medicine without a license - because licensed physicians know the "Standard of Care" for most cases of eye floaters is no treatment.
Success? It's not considered important. Cures and cured claims can be safely ignored, unless you are making a profit.
to your health, tracy
Author: A New Theory of Cure
That was all very well said. If only we could get you into medical schools. “there appears to be little medical interest unless the treatment is a profitable patent medicine or surgery or laser surgery. Even the concept of cause and cure is not taken seriously.” Absolutely.
BTW, in case this helps, floaters are one of the symptoms listed on Dr. Stefan Pieper's FQAD questionnaire, under:
Other Collagen Disorders
retinal detachment, uveitis, floaters, corneal damage
Collagen in my body was destroyed by the fluoroquinolone antibiotics so Dr. Berg’s information could also be a cause for me as well.
THIS!
Vitreous and retinal detachments are known to be caused by FQT, due to collagen destruction.
They always say it's something else, but never THIS.
Hope some of these methods help! So awful. Let me know.
Oh it was like a sci-fi horror movie. I didn't know yet. Going out for morning walks, electrical shocks thru brain and across skull, freaking out, thought it was a stroke, but nothing would happen. Sixty days like that. Pressure behind R eye was so bad, I swear it felt like it'd pop out, blood and brain gushing behind it. I'm lucky to still have that eye and no retinal detachment (fingers crossed). FQs have also caused people to go blind.
What so insidious about floaters is that they are a daily reminder of the FQ torture. Not butting into your business, but imo, your floaters are the floxing. NEVER had one in my life till then.
I've tried MSM drops, they seem to have helped, but then the floater's back. What I've noticed, strange as it may sound, is this:
Floxing functions in waves. The toxic reactions wax and wane. The waxing are the "flares." Every floxed victim knows exactly what the flares are like. I've had periods of apparent total "normalcy." Then a few days, or a week later, whamo! The tsunami hits. So... during a period where I was doing quite well, thinking that the toxic reactions were over, I no longer noticed the floater. It appeared to be gone. Now that I've been going thru a mild-relapse/flare, the floater's back. Is that possible? I don't know. But that's been my subjective observation.
I got lots of herxheimer reactions - whenever my body starts to heal, like after I try a fast, do a detox, do softwave, old symptoms and pains come back and then go away but then things are better. Has happened hundreds of times to me. I just expect it now. Not sure if that is the same thing as a “flare” - I also have to be very mindful of how much fluoride I get - when levels get high enough, all the same symptoms come back and there is nothing healing about that - it’s just too much fluoride for my system since I am now sensitive to fluoride. I have wondered if that’s what “flares” are for others but Idk.
lost a big reply. anyway. 1) I disagree with gahlili that floxing is just a flouride phenonm . 2) the atom is actually fluorine, good to specify, and 3) herxheimer (say what?), - Flares are merely a remanifestation, resurgence, of the original symptomns of the floxing (often with new ones appearing).
"whenever my body starts to heal, like after I try a fast, do a detox, do softwave, old symptoms and pains come back and then go away but then things are better"
How do you know that you would not be in the same state of recovery on your own, without any external support, based just on your genes. Because in fqad world there's much talk about that: that it's basically your body's ability to recovery and TIME.
Have you been able to determine that something EXTERNAL actually made a difference?
Because I haven't.
I'm not saying they don't. I just have not been able to PROVE it. Or at least DETERMINE it.